Switch To Product Links Languages Themes Feedback Sign Up Now
Loading...
Updating...
Please wait to edit...
Ready for editing X
report by dabernethy  276 views
Print Export Copy to My Account Embed in Website/Blog
    $ Macros
 
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Recycle Report
Name:_________________________________
4. Distinguished3. Proficient2. Apprentice1. Novice
Content-Essential Question:All information was accurate and was delivered effectively. Subject knowledge was thorough. Extensive details and relevant examples were used to answer the essential question.Subject knowledge was evident. Information included details and strong examples that provided a clear answer to the essential question.Information was relevant, but details and examples did not address the essential question. Subject knowledge was evident, but was not used to support argument.Information was confusing or irrelevant. Had few supporting details or examples. Did not answer the essential question. Subject knowledge was not sufficient to make successful argument.
Appropriateness, relevance, details, and examples
Research-Quality:Included facts, conclusions, and opinions from reliable sources. Included opinions of subject-matter experts.Included facts, conclusions, and opinions from reliable sources.Included a mixture of facts from reputable sources and opinions from unreliable sources.Included more opinion than fact. Information was taken from unreliable sources.
Information from reputable sources
Writing-Voice:Used personal style and feeling to engage the reader and communicate a message. Opinion was clear.Used emotion and feeling to communicate a message. Opinion was clear.Conveyed very little feeling or emotion in the piece. Opinion was hard to determine or writer seemed ambivalent.Conveyed no feeling or emotion in the piece. No opinion was apparent.
Gives reader a sense of author's opinions
Writing-Organization:All ideas were presented in a logical order. Introduction was clear, body included many details, and conclusion summarized main idea. Writing flowed smoothly throughout.Ideas were presented in a logical order. Introduction was clear, body included many details, and conclusion summarized main idea.Some ideas were presented in logical order. Introduction, body, and conclusion were included.Writing was fragmented. Ideas were not presented in logical order. Introduction, body, and conclusion were not clear.
Clear, logical sequence
Research-Documentation:Project bibliography or credits were complete and flawlessly formatted. All sources were cited and media included captions showing source.Project bibliography or credits were complete. All information and media sources were cited.Project bibliography or credits were incomplete. Less than half of the sources were cited.Did not include project bibliography or credits. One or two sources were cited.
Bibliography and citation
MyT4L Rubric www.tech4learning.com